Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÈòÁ㠾ȸé½Å°æÇÙ ¼¼Æ÷ÀÇ Àü±â»ý¸®ÇÐÀû ¹× ÇüÅÂÇÐÀû Ư¼º

Electrophysiological and morphological characteristics of facial mucleus in rat

´ëÇѼҾÆÄ¡°úÇÐȸÁö 2000³â 27±Ç 3È£ p.400 ~ 409
ÃÖº´ÁÖ, Á¶ÁøÈ­, ¹è¿ëö, ±è¿µÁø,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÃÖº´ÁÖ ( Choi Byung-Ju ) - °æºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
Á¶ÁøÈ­ ( Cho Jin-Hwa ) - °æºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
¹è¿ëö ( Bae Yong-Chul ) - °æºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­ÇغÎÇб³½Ç
±è¿µÁø ( Kim Young-Jin ) - °­¸ª´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

ÃÊ·ÏÀÌ ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
ÈòÁãÀÇ ¾È¸é½Å°æÇÙÀ» ±¸¼ºÇÏ´Â ½Å°æ¼¼Æ÷µéÀÇ ½Ã³À½º ¿¬°á ¾çÅ ¹× ¼¼Æ÷¸· Ư¼ºÀ» ±Ô¸íÇϱâ À§ÇØ in vivo ÇʵåÀüÀ§ ¹× ¼¼Æ÷³» ÀüÀ§ ÃøÁ¤¹ýÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© Àü±â»ý¸®Àû ¹ÝÀÀÀ» °üÂûÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¸»ÃÊ ¾È¸é½Å°æ ºÐÁö¸¦ ¿ªÇ༺À¸·Î Àü±âÀڱؽà Àڱؼ¼±â¿¡ ºñ·ÊÇÏ¿© ÀüÀ§ÀÇ Å©±â°¡ Áõ°¡µÇ¾ú°í Çʵå ÀüÀ§ÀÇ ¾çÅ´ µÎ °¡Áö ¹ÝÀÀÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Âµ¥ Àü±âÀÚ±Ø Á÷ÈÄ 1ms ºÎ±Ù¿¡¼­ Á¤Á¡À» ³ªÅ¸³»´Â ¾çÅÂ¿Í ÀÌ¿Í ´õºÒ¾î 7~8ms ºÎ±Ù¿¡¼­ Èıâ Á¤Á¡À» µ¿¹ÝÇÏ´Â ¾çÅ°¡ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ¾È¸é½Å°æÇÙÀº ¿°»ö½Ã ³»Ãø, ¹è¿ÜÃø, Áß°£Ãø ¹× ¿ÜÃøµî 4ºÎºÐÀÇ ¼ÒÇÙÀ¸·Î ±¸ºÐµÇ¾ú´Ù. NeurobiotinÀ¸·Î ä¿öÁø ´ÜÀÏ ½Å°æ¼¼Æ÷¸¦ ÇüÅÂÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î À籸ÃàÇÏ¿´´Âµ¥ ¼¼Æ÷ü´Â ÃßüÇüŸ¦ ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú°í ÁÖ ¼ö»óµ¹±â´Â ¸ðµç ¹æÇâÀ¸·Î »¸¾îÁ® ÀÖ¾ú°í °¢ ¼ö»óµ¹±âÀÇ ¿µ¿ªÀº ÇØ´ç ¼ÒÇÙ ³»¿¡ ÇÑÁ¤µÇ¾î ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ÀÏ·ÃÀÇ °úºÐ±Ø Àü·ù(-1.2~+1.2nA)¸¦ ¼¼Æ÷³»¿¡ °¡ÇÏ¿´À» ¶§ µ¿¹ÝµÇ´Â ¼¼Æ÷³» ÀüÀ§º¯È­¸¦ ÀÔ·ÂÀúÇ× °ªÀ¸·Î °è»êÇÏ¿´À» ¶§ ±× ±â¿ï±â°¡ Á÷¼±ÇüÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. Å»ºÐ±Ø Àü·ù¸¦ ¼¼Æ÷³» ÁÖÀԽà Áö¼ÓÀûÀÎ È°µ¿¼º ÀüÀ§°¡ ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç Àü·ùÀÇ Å©±â¿¡ ºñ·ÊÇÏ¿© °¢ ÀüÀ§ÀÇ °³¼ö°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´°í spike-ºóµµ ÀûÀÀ Çö»óÀÌ ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ½Ã°£ ÀÇÁ¸¼º ³»Ç⼺ Á¤·ùÇö»óÀº °üÂûµÇÁö ¾Ê¾Ò°í anodal break excitationÀÌ ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.

ÀÌ»óÀÇ ½ÇÇè°á°ú·Î º¸¾Æ ¾È¸é½Å°æÇÙÀ» ±¸¼ºÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Â ¼¼Æ÷µé »çÀÌÀÇ ½Ã³À½º´Â ´Ù¾çÇÑ ÇüÅ·ΠÁ¸ÀçÇÒ °¡´É¼ºÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù°í »ç·áµÇ¸ç ÀÌµé ½Ã³À½º°£ÀÇ º¯È­¸¦ ÅëÇÏ¿© ¾È¸é ½Å°æ¸¶ºñ, ¹ÝÂÊ ¾È¸é °æ·Ã, hypoglossal-facial anastomosisµî¿¡¼­ ³ªÅ¸³¯ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ÀÓ»óÀû ½Å°æ¼º Áõ»ó ±âÀüÀ» ¼³¸íÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿©°ÜÁø´Ù.

This study used in vivo intracellular and extracellular fIeld potential recording to evaluate the intrinsic membrane properties and connection pattern within facial nucleus.

1.There were four subdivisions of medial, intermediate, lateral, and dorsolateral in facial nucleus.

2.Principal cells in the facial nucleus was recorded from and filled with neurobiotin in anesthetized rats. The extent of their dendrites and the characteristics of cell body were examined.

3.Principal cells had a large amplitude action potential and afterhyperpolarization was followed a single action potential.

4.The response from facial motonucleus to electrical stimulation of the facial nerve was mainly a monophasic wave, with a latency of 1 msec, which was assumed to reflect antidromic activation of facial motoneurons. In some of rats the response in addition showed late components at a latency of about 7-8 msec, but its amplitude was small.

5.Mest of cells exhibited accommodation of spike discharge upon depolarization of membrane by 0.8 nA for 400 ms.

Our results support the hypothesis that there normally are weak connections between different parts of the facial motonucleus to explain pathophysiology of hemifacial spasm and facial nerve paralysis.

Å°¿öµå

¾È¸é½Å°æÇÙ;½Ã³À½º;½Å°æ¼¼Æ÷¸· Ư¼º;¾È¸é½Å°æ¸¶ºñ;¹ÝÂÊ ¾È¸é °æ·Ã
Facial nucleus;Synapse;Membrane properties; Facial nerve paralysis;Hemifacial spasm

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI